The 6-Month Rule for Step-Up in Basis: What Executors Should Know
May 29th, 2026
Estimated Reading Time: 6 Minutes
When someone inherits an investment account, a home, or another appreciated asset, the cost basis of that asset is generally adjusted to its fair market value as of the date of death. This adjustment, known as the step-up in basis, can significantly reduce the capital gains tax the heirs owe when they later sell. What many families do not realize is that the executor of the estate has some flexibility in choosing the date used to set that new basis.
The Default Rule, and the Election That Changes It
When someone dies, the assets in their estate are generally valued as of the date of death. This is the value used to calculate any federal estate tax that may be owed, and it is also the value that becomes the new cost basis for the heirs — what is commonly called the step-up in basis.
There is, however, an alternative. Under Section 2032 of the Internal Revenue Code, the executor of an estate may elect to value all of the estate's assets as of six months after the date of death rather than the date of death itself. This is referred to as the alternate valuation date election. It can lower the estate tax owed in years when asset values decline. But the same election that lowers the estate tax also lowers the basis the heirs inherit, which may increase their future capital gains tax bill when they later sell.
For families whose estates may be subject to federal estate tax, understanding how this election works and what it costs is an important part of estate planning.
How the Alternate Valuation Date Election Works
The alternate valuation date election is governed by a specific set of rules. Several mechanical points shape when and how it can be used.
It Must Lower Both the Gross Estate and the Estate Tax
The IRS does not allow the election simply to give heirs a different basis. The election is only permitted if it reduces both the value of the gross estate and the federal estate tax owed. Estates that owe no federal estate tax — which, for 2026, means most estates below $15 million for an individual or $30 million for a married couple using portability — cannot make the election.
It Applies to All Assets in the Estate
The executor cannot mix and match. Once the election is made, every asset in the estate is valued as of the alternate date. If some assets have appreciated over the six months while others have declined, the net effect must still reduce the estate's total value.
Assets Sold or Distributed Within Six Months Are Valued at the Disposition Date
If the executor sells, distributes, or otherwise transfers an asset during the six-month window, that asset is valued as of the date it left the estate, not the alternate date. This prevents an executor from holding assets that have dropped while selling those that have recovered.
The Election Is Irrevocable
Once the election is made on Form 706, the federal estate tax return, it cannot be reversed. The return is generally due nine months after the date of death, with a six-month extension available, so the decision window is not unlimited.
Estate Tax Today vs. Capital Gains Tomorrow
This is the part of the election that often catches families by surprise. When an executor elects the alternate valuation date, the heirs' cost basis is set at the alternate date value, not the date-of-death value. A lower value for estate tax purposes also means a lower step-up in basis.
If the heirs later sell the inherited assets at a higher price, they may owe capital gains tax on a larger gain than they would have if the date-of-death value had been used. The estate tax savings today can become the heirs' income tax bill tomorrow.
A Side-by-Side Look
Consider an estate that holds 100,000 shares of a single stock. On the date of death, the stock is trading at $80, for a position worth $8 million. Six months later, the stock has dropped to $65, for a value of $6.5 million.
|
Scenario |
Date of Death |
Six Months Later |
|
Stock price per share |
$80 |
$65 |
|
Total value (100,000 shares) |
$8.0 million |
$6.5 million |
|
Estate tax at 40% on the difference |
— |
$600,000 saved* |
|
Heirs' cost basis per share |
$80 |
$65 |
*The information provided is general in nature and not tailored to individual circumstances. Please consult with a qualified financial advisor for personalized advice.
The estate is large enough that the $1.5 million reduction in gross estate value lowers the federal estate tax bill by approximately $600,000 at the 40% top marginal rate. By electing the alternate date, the estate saves $600,000.
Now consider what happens next. The heirs receive the stock with a basis of $65 per share. Two years later, the stock has recovered to $90 and the heirs decide to sell. The taxable gain is $25 per share, or $2.5 million across the position. At a 23.8% top federal long-term capital gains rate, that is approximately $595,000 in capital gains tax — nearly the same amount the estate saved on the front end.
Whether the election is still worth making depends on what the heirs plan to do with the inherited assets. If they expect to hold long-term, donate to charity, or hold until their own death — when a second step-up may apply — the election may still be the right choice. If they expect to sell soon after inheritance to diversify or to fund liquidity needs, the math may be much closer than the estate tax savings alone suggest.
When the Election Is Most Likely to Make Sense
The alternate valuation date election is a useful tool in specific circumstances. A few situations where it tends to come into play:
- Estates holding concentrated stock positions, where a single security can swing meaningfully in value over six months.
- Estates with significant real estate or closely held business interests that may be reappraised lower after a downturn.
- Estates where the date-of-death value sits close to the federal exemption threshold, and a modest decline could reduce or eliminate estate tax.
- Estates with heirs who plan to hold inherited assets long-term, reducing the future capital gains concern.
Estates with broadly diversified portfolios and heirs who plan to rebalance or sell shortly after inheritance are less likely to find the election attractive, because the future capital gains cost can offset much of the estate tax savings.
Key Considerations for Executors
If you are serving as an executor or working with one, a few additional points are worth raising with the estate's advisors.
State Estate Tax Rules May Differ
Not every state with its own estate tax conforms to the federal alternate valuation date. Electing the federal alternate date can create a basis mismatch between federal and state tax purposes in some states.
Communication with Heirs Matters
Heirs often do not realize the alternate valuation election affects their own future tax bill. Including them in the analysis early — particularly if they may want to sell soon after inheritance — avoids unwelcome surprises later.
Some Assets Are Excluded From the Election
Assets affected by the mere lapse of time, such as patents, life estates, and remainder interests, are still valued as of the date of death even if the alternate election is made. The rules in this area can be detailed and are worth reviewing with the estate's attorney.
Conclusion
The alternate valuation date is a useful planning tool, but it is not a free option. The right framework is to weigh the estate tax saved today against the income tax the heirs may owe in the future — and to make sure the family makes that tradeoff with full awareness of what is being given up on each side.
If your family is navigating estate planning decisions, working with an experienced advisor and estate planning attorney can help ensure these elections are evaluated in the context of your full financial picture. Contact us to discuss how these strategies may fit into your plan.
Sources:
-
-
Internal Revenue Service. (October 9, 2025). "IRS releases tax inflation adjustments for tax year 2026, including amendments from the One, Big, Beautiful Bill." Retrieved from https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/irs-releases-tax-inflation-adjustments-for-tax-year-2026-including-amendments-from-the-one-big-beautiful-bill.
-
Internal Revenue Service. (n.d.). "Publication 551 (12/2024), Basis of Assets." Retrieved from https://www.irs.gov/publications/p551.
-
Mercer Capital. (July 31, 2020). "Consider the Alternate Valuation Date." Retrieved from https://mercercapital.com/article/consider-the-alternate-valuation-date/.
-
Greenleaf Trust. (April 16, 2026). "Alternate Valuation Date - A Refresher." Retrieved from https://greenleaftrust.com/missives/alternate-valuation-date-a-refresher/.
-
Important Disclosure Information
Please remember that past performance is no guarantee of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by Chicago Partners Investment Group LLC (“CP”)), or any non-investment related content, made reference to directly or indirectly in this blog will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions. Moreover, no portion of this discussion or information serves as the receipt of, or a substitute for, personalized investment advice from CP. contained in this blog serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from CP. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisor of his/her choosing. Neither CP’s investment adviser registration status, nor any amount of prior experience or success, should be construed that a certain level of results or satisfaction will be achieved if CP is engaged, or continues to be engaged, to provide investment advisory services. CP is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the blog content should be construed as legal or accounting advice. A copy of the CP’s current written disclosure Brochure and Form CRS discussing our advisory services and fees is available for review upon request or at www.chicagopartnersllc.com. Please Note: CP does not make any representations or warranties as to the accuracy, timeliness, suitability, completeness, or relevance of any information prepared by any unaffiliated third party, whether linked to CP’s web site or blog or incorporated herein, and takes no responsibility for any such content. All such information is provided solely for convenience purposes only and all users thereof should be guided accordingly. Please Remember: If you are a CP client, please contact CP, in writing, if there are any changes in your personal/financial situation or investment objectives for the purpose of reviewing/evaluating/revising our previous recommendations and/or services, or if you would like to impose, add, or to modify any reasonable restrictions to our investment advisory services. Unless, and until, you notify us, in writing, to the contrary, we shall continue to provide services as we do currently. Please Also Remember to advise us if you have not been receiving account statements (at least quarterly) from the account custodian.

